Well, one thing that is for sure, the gamer's keyboard market seems to be getting more and more crowded with no signs of slowing down. So, perhaps this boom is here to stay for a while. I don't think one can easily escape from any mechanical keyboard vendors without spoting a RGB keyboard. Even Matias is putting out backlit keyboard (with scissor switches however, I think). The latest innovation in that area is to store the lighting program in the onboard memory, some comes with 8MB of that. So, look out for some very fancy color effects to either excite the player or to drive the competition crazy with brilliance.....
The second trend seems to be retro styling. There are quite a few keyboards trying to emulate that old-school typewriter look and feel. Now, I am waiting for some clever vendor to use 400g load springs for the key switches to complete the effect. Nothing wrong with that, just that fashionable things seem to come and go and then come back again. At this rate, we will have a psychedelic RGB lighting retro typewriter style caps with 400g weighted keys mechanical keyboard. Maybe Unicomp could put out a RGB lighted buckling spring Model M keyboard? Welcome to a blast to the past.
Showing posts with label buckling spring. Show all posts
Showing posts with label buckling spring. Show all posts
Thursday, January 12, 2017
Thursday, December 3, 2015
Yeah, Topre wins this round…. for now....
As much as I hate to admit it, I have come to love Topre
switch based keyboard. That means a lot
of money sunk into a keyboard that’s close to a rubber dome, rather than a true
mechanical switch keyboard such as the Cherry MX. I really enjoy using Cherry MX based keyboard
as well. I love both the MX Brown and MX
blue. I most certainly enjoy my time
with the buckling spring. It’s so much
fun to drive a few people nuts with that board.
Sometimes…. So, I am not that
picky to be honest. Then again, please
no variable force keyboards please. I
simply cannot abide by that. It was an
interesting experiment and somewhat tainted my views of Topre switch for quite
some time.
The one thing I truly value in a Topre switch is the
smoothness. It’s something that Topre
has perfected and hard to put a finger on it.
Pun intended. However, I am
beginning to hear good things about Gateron.
Yes, Gateron is one of the many Cherry MX cloners, but it seems to begin
to claim a certain personality of its own: smoothness. Perhaps it was choices of plastic and/or
slight different position of actuation and hysteresis make it appear to do
so. I don’t know. However, I am now quite eager to evaluate a
Gateron based switch keyboard and see what happens. If it does have that prized smoothness that I
found Topre to be so endearing, then it would be an excellent and economical
choice. Stay tuned.
Monday, November 30, 2015
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 long term use review
Ahhhh… Buckling spring switches keyboard certainly turns nostalgia
up a notch or two. The keyboard switches
remind me much of my youth. I always
thought it was funny to having a PC with a buckling spring keyboard in a
library. Echoes could be heard around
the library when someone busy typing up a book report. Fun times…..
Anyhow, as much as I want to be objective, the tinted rose color memory
of teenage years simply get in the way, but I will try anyway.
Since IBM no longer manufactures Model M keyboard and sold
the rights to Unicomp, it’s up to Unicomp now to maintain the mantle. Given that Unicomp is vastly smaller than IBM
or Lexmark, it’s hard to have the same market presence. Also, the Model M keyboards are close to indestructible. So, one can still find one within reasonable
price in the used keyboard market. Despite
these negative factors, Unicomp soldiers on with this important keyboard
legacy. The world is just a little better place because of it.
Now, the buckling spring switches work, sound, feel overall
just as I remembered it. The classic PBT
key cap feel right at home with this keyboard and boy is it loud! The melodies of the buckling spring keyboard
is a divisive force. One might enjoy it
while others will give you a dirty look as soon as your hand get near the
keyboard. Folks who passed by also
commented that the keyboard sound reminded them of college and high school
computer labs.
Indeed, Unicomp priced these keyboards to move. The price is competitive with the Cherry MX
clones and are within shouting distance of a mainstream genuine Cherry MX
board. Perhaps because of cost or even
acoustic factors, Unicomp ditched the all metal clad shell and opted for a
plastic case that could easily manufactured, provided that it has a good mold and
plastic injection machine. I bring this
up because it clear that the keyboard’s looks are secondary design goals. Upon first glance, someone might mistake this
board for a run of the mill cheap board.
OK, it does look cheap, run of the mill cheap keyboard. However, one push on the key and all
perception change. So, the production
value is on the low side.
Quality
control is another thing. Little things
here and there don’t quite align perfectly; nothing a little trim here and polish there won’t solve, but it simple pales in comparison to higher machining prowess
of other larger keyboard makers. For
example, putting it next Ducky Legend with its all metallic top covering and it
is clear as day and night. Unicomp spent
all the budget on the key feels and not really the looks and it shows. However, this keyboard will hold up to years
of use without much missing a beat because all the attention is on the
important bits. I have been using this
keyboard for a while now and I have gotten quite used to the key weights and it
still looks new. So, I have reasonable
confidence in its durability. I have not encountered any issues regarding to the keys thus far.
I enjoy typing on this keyboard quite a bit, but it is most
certainly an acquired taste. The keys
march in precision with authoritative affirmation, a traditional typist’s
dream, but touch typist need not apply.
Also, this keyboard will not be welcomed at a library these days, I am
pretty sure about that. The only minor thing I have noticed is that the key caps seem a little slippery to me, probably because it doesn't have as deep of a scoop like the Realforce 104UG. On the other hand, fingers easily glide off from one to another if needed. Thus, it does facilitate higher typing rate if one learns to take advantage of that. I, however, don't have such graceful typing style. So, that's probably their goal rather than a design slip up, no pun intended.
Overall: This is a
specialist keyboard, but it excels at its primary directive at the expanse of
its looks. So, this one will not attract
attention, unless it’s the A-10 Warthog type attention you are looking for. Indeed, the Ultra Classic is not going to win
any design awards, but boy, does it shine at what it does while holding up well
after much use.
Grade: B
Friday, September 25, 2015
One interesting question
There is a supposition that better designed keyboard makes
someone a better typist. Of course, what
is a better designed keyboard is up for debate.
However, I am wondering about this question myself. My primary motivation initially was simply to
get a keyboard that’s better for my hands.
I was having some rough spots using an old keyboard that is getting too
stiff for me type within reason. So,
it’s more of an ergonomic reason than anything else. However, I do want to look into the theory
that some keyboards can make someone a better typist, pending on the style of
course. Let’ suppose that a touch typist
will likely dread the buckling spring keyboard made by Unicomp. But who knows, by building up the finger
muscles with the buckling spring switches, these “trained” touch typists would
go to their favorite keyboards and just dance because everything is suddenly so
light.
I don’t know how to put this idea to the test, but it is
definitely appealing. However, without
properly thought out experiments and controls, it’s tough to draw any
reasonable conclusion or even to demonstrate a solid correlation. I am sure keyboard makers are also trying to
come up new ways to justify the superiority of their wares. What better way to make a sale than to
demonstrate that keyboard X will make you a better typist, or better yet, a
better person. For now, I believe the
focus is on reaction time to make someone a better gamer rather than making
someone a better typist. Perhaps someday
that will come. We will see….
Saturday, September 12, 2015
Roswill RK-9000 V2 versus Unicomp Ultra Classic 104
As promised, this is a more reasonable match up then having
Unicomp going up against Ducky Legend, which is more of a premium product that
is in a different price bracket. This is
an interesting comparison because not only the switches are different, but
whole keyboard package feels different as well.
So, let’s break down a bit.
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 is a full sized keyboard with an
extra shoulder above the function keys as in tradition with the IBM model
M. So, someone can park some little
items such as pens or paper clips or post-it even there. It’s rather convenient. However, it does take a lot of space. Rosewill elected for space saving by
eliminating that extra margin. The outer
shell for Unicomp is likely ABS plastic while Rosewill opted for some metallic
material for the top cover and plastic on the bottom. So, in turns of style, Rosewill has flairs to
spare while Unicomp is ultimately one of the most utilitarian keyboard I have
encountered thus far. The key legends on
Unicomp is dye sub while the Rosewill is supposed to be laser etched with ink
filled in. Ultra Classic’s key caps
seems smaller, which demands more precision while Rosewill appears to be
roomier, tolerating more sloppy strikes.
So, when one breaks down to the bottom of it, The Ultra
Classic really should viewed as a workhorse, capable of doing its tasks day in
and day out without missing a beat, while the Rosewill has a bit of a showy
tendency and personality but not far enough to distract its purpose. These external factor differences are not
likely to take over the switch choice discussion. So, in this case, the switch choice will
dominate the decision if I have to pick one or the other. I think most people would agree that this is
almost like comparing apple to oranges.
Thoughts?
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Ducky Legend versus Unicomp Ultra Classic 104
The Ducky Legend is certainly a keyboard that I like using. It is well made, has a great style and a little bit of bling here and there just to keep things interesting. The Unicomp on the other hand, is the ultimate utilitarian design. There really isn't much that is devoted for aesthetics. Side by side, they are like Arnold and Denny in the movie Twins.
The heart of the matter is the key switch. Both of them are the clicky type that generate fine tactile feedback and well as auditory sensations that some equates to assault. Each has its own personality and flair. I won't repeat my characterization of the two type of keys switches, but I want to compare and contrast the keyboards as whole package. As I learned early on, the whole thing viewed together is a better assessment since no one just use the switches by themselves. The best switch could be placed on a mediocre platform and the whole experience would be mediocre at best.
I kind of feel that the comparison is a bit unfair, since Ducky Legend obviously has a higher production value. A more fair comparison perhaps would be the Rosewill RK-9000 V2 against Unicomp's Ultra Classic 104. They are more closely priced. Since I just wrote all these, I am not going to toss it. So, stay tuned for a more fair fight. :P
In any case, if you are a fan of the buckling spring keyboard, there really is no other choice besides Unicomp or an used Model M keyboard. However, if someone is more open to try different switches, then Ducky Legend is certainly worth considering regardless of which Cherry MX switches type.
The heart of the matter is the key switch. Both of them are the clicky type that generate fine tactile feedback and well as auditory sensations that some equates to assault. Each has its own personality and flair. I won't repeat my characterization of the two type of keys switches, but I want to compare and contrast the keyboards as whole package. As I learned early on, the whole thing viewed together is a better assessment since no one just use the switches by themselves. The best switch could be placed on a mediocre platform and the whole experience would be mediocre at best.
I kind of feel that the comparison is a bit unfair, since Ducky Legend obviously has a higher production value. A more fair comparison perhaps would be the Rosewill RK-9000 V2 against Unicomp's Ultra Classic 104. They are more closely priced. Since I just wrote all these, I am not going to toss it. So, stay tuned for a more fair fight. :P
In any case, if you are a fan of the buckling spring keyboard, there really is no other choice besides Unicomp or an used Model M keyboard. However, if someone is more open to try different switches, then Ducky Legend is certainly worth considering regardless of which Cherry MX switches type.
Friday, September 4, 2015
Cherry MX Brown switch revisited….
After exploring the Topre switches, it’s kind of nice to
come back to a switch that’s familiar and comfortable to use. I have grown to appreciate the Topre switch,
but also time for me to reflect on some of the other types that I have liked
thus far and help me reexamine why I like them more than others that are
around. Brown is simply the champion
right now. However, the Topre and Matias
quiet click have given me sufficient reasons to take another look.
The Matias quiet is really complex tactile switch that
reached back to the heydays of ALPS switch.
The ALPS switches were really popular with Mac crowd. I didn’t have the privilege of using the
Apple Extended Keyboard as much as I should have, just like the Model M, but I have
heard they are great. Different from the
classic Model M, but shined in its own way.
So, how does the MX brown stand up to those
challengers. I think it stood up pretty
well. For one thing, there’s really not
much I dislike about the switch and lot for me to like. Topre’s smoothness is legendary and Brown’s a
little scratchy tactile feedback is just fine for someone like me. It doesn’t bother me at all. It’s not too loud, but has enough auditory cue
for me to know what’s going on with the switch operation. It doesn’t have the melodic songs ringing out
from Model M. Instead it’s kind of chirpy
rather than out right songs. It doesn’t
have a complex tactile sensation like the Matias, but enough to let me know
what’s going on. I do appreciate these
little things. It’s one of the most
popular switches, and Cherry is definitely doing something right. Yes, it’s not for everyone, but it’s a
generalist that’s good enough for most use cases. Topre, Model M and Matias are specialists
that cater to certain groups. I would
like to examine that concept a bit more closely later on. For now, the Das Keyboard with Cherry MX
brown switches is here to stay because it really does offer a really good
overall package.
Monday, August 17, 2015
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 keyboard image gallery
Here's the image gallery for Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 keyboard. Enjoy!
![]() |
| Front side view |
![]() |
| Left side view |
![]() |
| Right side view |
![]() |
| Key caps and switch view, Unicomp uses double key caps design, the inner cap closes up the spring |
![]() |
| Key caps and switch view, the legends are on the outer key cap |
![]() |
| Buckling spring switch, see the spring exposed above and next to it, the spring capped |
![]() |
| Inner cap and outer cap view, legends are dye subbed |
![]() |
| Backside view of the caps |
![]() |
| Key lock indicators and Unicomp logo |
![]() |
| Backside view, noticed the Model M label imprinted in plastic |
![]() |
| Keyboard foot retracted |
![]() |
| Keyboard foot extended |
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 impression, part3
The buckling spring keyboard switch is an interesting
beast. As I chronicled before, the
switch is definitely for enthusiasts who really like certain keyboard switch
characteristics. I was trained on a
mechanical typewriter and I found that typing was work. Really.
So, I went the other way to a soft touch typist friendly BTC keyboard,
which was in some way a precursor to the today's rubber dome keyboard using foam
pads. Anyhow, now that I have been using
the real deal for a while, I still have the same reaction as I had many years
ago. This thing is hard to press and
quite loud….
One of the major selling points for a higher key switch
activation resistance is that the fingers won’t bottom out as much. Although I have my doubts about the theory
applies to all as different people type differently, never the less, I think
that may be true for a sizable user population.
So, I did do a brief test of the theory and perhaps I do bottom out a
bit less because my fingers are already tired by time it goes to the
bottom. So, it is inconclusive right
now. I will need some major high grade instrumentation tools to prove this and I don’t have access to such facility. Not yet, at least. So, I am willing to accept that such
phenomenon might exist, but further research may be required. Anyway, that’s beside the point. Anyhow, the Unicomp keyboard does invoke the
classic IBM Model M experience and replicated quite well, as far as I
remember. However, this is indeed a
specialist keyboard and hence quite limited to a niche market for those who
really enjoy the buckling spring mechanism.
Do I like it? Yup as I am still a fan of the tactile clicky switch based
keyboard and there’s nothing like buckling springs.
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 impression, round 2
Yup, it’s old school all right. The key caps feel like it, sounds like it and
certainly the typing action is just like it.
Some will argue that a real IBM model M is the only real game in town,
but I think this one can lay claim to the vacated throne room for the classic
keyboard feel. However, I am not
evaluating based on nostalgia alone, as that will only get the keyboard so far
in the tryout. So, against a more modern
design such as Cherry MX, Matias or Topre, how does it stack up?
The key action is crisp, clean. I really do know when I activated the
switch. There’s both a bright, clear auditory
and tactile cue, similar to the Cherry MX blue.
In fact, the MX blue is likely trying to leverage this memory to its
advantage. No doubt that it worked on
me. So, now the real McCoy is in town,
what’s the difference? For one thing,
the buckling spring has a very steep force-distance drop off curve when it is
activated after a fairly linear start.
Once the switch is activated, the force drop off like a cliff as the
spring has just buckled and releasing its energy as sound and spring moment. Like the blue switch, it has a long
hysteresis (or reset distance) section where the switch can’t be activated
again till it returns to rest position.
The blue switch’s curve is a lot gentler when compare to the buckling
spring sudden drop. So, that accounts
for the super clean, snappy key action.
It also takes a lot of force to activate the switch, around 75g or
so. So, it’s more deliberate and
methodological than the speedier MX blue.
Of course, there’s nothing like the MX blue shriek, but the buckling
spring has its own choir too. The sound
is a bit like snap or slap and then ringing till it fades and it’s quite loud
too.
So, this is definitely not a keyboard for touch
typists. This is a keyboard that demands
deliberate, forceful action to function properly. It does so with loud confirmation in a very
drill sergeant like manner and not shy about it every step of the way. Against the MX blue, the buckling spring is what
MX blue aspire to be when it grows up.
Right now, MX blue is still got that squeaky voice…..
Monday, July 6, 2015
Unicomp Ultra Classic 104 impression
Time to test out the good ol-buckling spring keyboard from
Unicomp. Yes, the key chatter during the course of normal typing brings
back memories, but I think I am a little unprepared as to how I will respond to
this. The keys are still pretty hard to
press. There’s a lot of chatter going on
when I start to type fast due to the fingers gliding on the keycaps. Like the Topre keyboard, I think this one
will take some more time for me to get used to in order to have a meaningful
impression. I have been wrong a few
times about first impression with the keyboards. So, I am a little hesitant to jump into
conclusions. It’s as tough as I
remembered. So, I can definitely see what
this would not be a popular switch among touch typists or those who prefer the
golden silence over cacophony. Now, what’s
music and cacophony is a matter of personal taste. I think the sound of the spring is somewhat
musical, but this is not exactly Mozart’s symphony either. I like the sound coming from the brown or the
Matias tactile (or clicky) the most thus far.
Anyway, this is a really interesting experience because phantom typing and actually seeing the words appear on the screen are two different experiences. I was able to type rather quickly just putting it on top of boxes and go. Now, when I am actually doing input, I am not able to go as fast because now, mistakes are obvious. It’s not that the keys are not responsive, but my fingers are getting tired. Time to build up the finger muscles. Wow, this is wearing me out. I wonder if I can do this day in and day out. However, I do need to work out some more in order to put this keyboard through a real test. So, I will have another impression soon.
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Unicomp to the rescue
According to their company history, Unicomp is classified as a small business in Lexington, Kentucky. Around 1996, Unicomp purchased the license, the tools and the machines to make buckling spring keyboards from IBM/Lexmark. From the sound of it, they got the assembly line and the rights to make these famous keyboards. I suppose they probably retained most of the people as well.
Since IBM no longer make Model Ms anymore, there is no USB version. The only way to get those to work on a PC without PS/2 ports is to use a PS/2 to USB adapter. Because buckling spring mechanism uses more electric current, thus a converter that only provide little bit of power will not work. Most rubber dome keyboards don't require the extra juice, so many converter makers didn't have a good business reason to provide more power than necessary. So, choose carefully! Anyhow, Unicomp does make them with USB interface for modern PCs and Macs. And, if someone wants to go old school, they do sell the PS/2 version. I don't know if they have boards with the good-ol' AT interface tho.... Ultra Classic line is Unicomp's best offering right now. I have heard that they are working on a ten-key-less (TKL) version, but I don't think it's on the market as of yet.
So, I am hoping to get one of those classics and test them out for the Mechanical KB tryout. I really want another chance to get to know this classic design and see how it compares to modern Cherry MX switches and Matias ones as well. Stay tuned!
Since IBM no longer make Model Ms anymore, there is no USB version. The only way to get those to work on a PC without PS/2 ports is to use a PS/2 to USB adapter. Because buckling spring mechanism uses more electric current, thus a converter that only provide little bit of power will not work. Most rubber dome keyboards don't require the extra juice, so many converter makers didn't have a good business reason to provide more power than necessary. So, choose carefully! Anyhow, Unicomp does make them with USB interface for modern PCs and Macs. And, if someone wants to go old school, they do sell the PS/2 version. I don't know if they have boards with the good-ol' AT interface tho.... Ultra Classic line is Unicomp's best offering right now. I have heard that they are working on a ten-key-less (TKL) version, but I don't think it's on the market as of yet.
So, I am hoping to get one of those classics and test them out for the Mechanical KB tryout. I really want another chance to get to know this classic design and see how it compares to modern Cherry MX switches and Matias ones as well. Stay tuned!
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Remembering the old classic Model M keyboard, 1391401
Wow, that brings back memories. The IBM Model M 1391401 keyboard is considered the grand-pupa of modern mechanical keyboards. The famous buckling spring mechanism is quite an ergonomic engineering feat. So far, it's unique feel has not been replicated. I haven't had too many opportunities to interact with genuine IBM keyboards back in the 20th century. The first time I touched an IBM made keyboard was my aunt's IBM PC (yes, the original). It was a Model F, with 83 keys instead of the more modern 101 keys setup. All I remember was the key was super hard to push. Remember, I was just a little shrimp back then. I never understood why the keys are so hard to push. I felt like I was about to launch the Space Shuttle every time when I press a key. Yeah, I was just a kid, what did I know. Besides, the PC was for playing games with the cousins right?
Anyhow, later, on I did get a chance to use the IBM Model M keyboard for school work on the huge PS/2 Model 80. The keyboard was a massive block of metal and super loud keys. It was as hard to press as I remembered as a child. I mostly used softer type keyboards made by BTC back then. The BTC keyboards were really different from today's rubber dome as well. It used spring, foam and foil pairing as key switch. Therefore, the keys are very light and not very tactile. Later, I learned typing on a traditional type writer and thus I pounded those poor keyboards out of habit. The space bar was rather crooked from much abuse if I recall. Still, I most certainly didn't appreciate Model M's finer quality then. In the early 1990s, IBM stopped making the Model M keyboards and contracted it out to Lexmark (IBM's spin-off). After a while, Lexmark stopped make them as well. So, I missed a chance to truly experience and appreciate its greatness back in its heyday.
The good thing is that those keyboards were so well built that most of them still work today. Thus, there's a thriving used market for them. Just check eBay and see. :) There are even specialty stores such as clickykeyboards.com dedicated to restoring the model Ms and reselling them. No one made new ones anymore and then, there's Unicomp....
Anyhow, later, on I did get a chance to use the IBM Model M keyboard for school work on the huge PS/2 Model 80. The keyboard was a massive block of metal and super loud keys. It was as hard to press as I remembered as a child. I mostly used softer type keyboards made by BTC back then. The BTC keyboards were really different from today's rubber dome as well. It used spring, foam and foil pairing as key switch. Therefore, the keys are very light and not very tactile. Later, I learned typing on a traditional type writer and thus I pounded those poor keyboards out of habit. The space bar was rather crooked from much abuse if I recall. Still, I most certainly didn't appreciate Model M's finer quality then. In the early 1990s, IBM stopped making the Model M keyboards and contracted it out to Lexmark (IBM's spin-off). After a while, Lexmark stopped make them as well. So, I missed a chance to truly experience and appreciate its greatness back in its heyday.
The good thing is that those keyboards were so well built that most of them still work today. Thus, there's a thriving used market for them. Just check eBay and see. :) There are even specialty stores such as clickykeyboards.com dedicated to restoring the model Ms and reselling them. No one made new ones anymore and then, there's Unicomp....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















